Volume 3, Issue 5, September 2015, Page: 47-56
Physiological Growth Response in Seedlings of Arabica Coffee Genotypes Under Contrasting Nursery Microenvironments
Taye Kufa, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia
J. Burkhardt, University of Bonn, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation-Plant Nutrition, Bonn, Germany
Received: Aug. 29, 2015;       Accepted: Sep. 11, 2015;       Published: Oct. 16, 2015
DOI: 10.11648/j.plant.20150305.11      View  3674      Downloads  78
Abstract
Arabica coffee genetic resources and shade-grown coffee landscapes are under threat largely due to human activities and lack of scientific information and understanding on adaptation mechanisms along environmental gradients. The study aims to describe the variability in early physiological growth responses in arabica coffee genotypes of varying geographical areas in Ethiopia, its birthplace. The experiment was carried out under contrasting nursery microclimatic settings at the Jimma Agricultural Research Center in Ethiopia. A split- plot design with three replications of two sunlight regimes and twelve-coffee genotypes were arranged as main and sub-plot treatments, respectively. One-year-old coffee seedlings were used to measure shoot and root growth parts and calculate derivatives on physiological parameters. The results depicted that coffee nursery shade gradients had highly significant influence on leaf mass ratio (LMR) with higher value measured in shaded seedlings. In contrast, seedlings under full-sunlight produced significantly higher shoot mass ratio (SMR). Likewise, LMR was highly significantly different due to natural sunlight regimes, genotypes and interaction effects. Seedlings exposed to direct sunlight had relatively higher root mass ratio (RMR), SMR, canopy area (CA) and leaf area index (LAI). The results also revealed significant responses among coffee genotypes in RMR and LMR. Accessions from the drier Harenna areas exhibited the highest RMR, but least LMR. The accession from Bonga had the highest specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf area ratio (LAR) as opposed to the lowest SLA and LAR in the Yayu and Harenna populations, respectively. Unlike RMR, LARMR was linked to LMR and was low for Harenna and high for Berhane-Kontir. The results also exhibited reduced specific stem lengths for Harenna and Yayu, which had the highest and lowest LAI, respectively. The study shows considerable differences between open sun and shaded seedlings as well as among arabica coffee genotypes for most physiological growth characteristics considered. The results clearly demonstrate the need for shade microenvironments for production of high quality coffee seedlings with balanced shoot and root growth. The study also describes significantly different magnitudes and patterns of relationships between growth traits for future work. In view of the impacts of changing climate on coffee plant, the findings deliver evidence on genetic diversity within arabica coffee accessions of varying geographical areas in Ethiopia. However, further investigations, inter alia, on detail coffee evolutionary, anatomy, molecular, ecophysiological and desirable agronomic traits across seasons and locations for understanding adaptation strategies to environmental stresses and identifying suitable coffee cultivars for specific geographical areas.
Keywords
Coffee Environments, Genetic Diversity, Microclimate, Physiological Traits, Wild Coffee
To cite this article
Taye Kufa, J. Burkhardt, Physiological Growth Response in Seedlings of Arabica Coffee Genotypes Under Contrasting Nursery Microenvironments, Plant. Vol. 3, No. 5, 2015, pp. 47-56. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20150305.11
Reference
[1]
R. M. Chaves, A. Ten-Caten, H. A. Pinheiro, A. Ribeiro, F. M. Damatta, “Seasonal changes in photoprotective mechanisms of leaves from shaded and unshaded field-grown coffee (Coffea arabica L.) trees.” Trees vol. 22, pp. 351-361, 2008.
[2]
D. J. Walyero, H. A. M. Van der Vossen, “Early determination of yield potential in Arabica coffee by applying index selection. ” Euphytica vol. 28, pp. 465-472, 1979.
[3]
Yacob Edjamo, “Relative performance of three CBD cultivars under varying light regimes.” Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific Colloquium on Coffee (ASIC), Montpelier, France, 1993.
[4]
J. N. Wintgens, Coffee: Growing, Processing, Sustainable Production. A guide for growers, traders, and researchers. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
[5]
G. Wrigley, Coffee. Tropical Agriculture Series, London, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1988.
[6]
M. G. R. Cannell, “Production and distribution of dry matter in trees of Coffea arabica L. in Kenya as affected by seasonal climatic differences and the presence of fruits.” Ann.appl. Biol.vol. 67, pp. 99-120, 1971.
[7]
J. I. Fahl, M. L. C. Carelli, J. Vega, A. C. Magalhães, “Nitrogen and irradiance levels affecting net photosynthesis and growth of young coffee plants (Coffea arabica L.).” Journal of Horticultural Science vol. 69, pp.161-169, 1994.
[8]
F. B. Salisbury, C. Ross, Plant physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California 94002, a division of Wadsworth, Inc. 1992.
[9]
V. P. G. Gutschick, FW. Weigel, “Optimizing the canopy photosynthetic rate by patterns of investments in specific leaf mass.” Am Nat. vol. 132, pp. 68–85, 1988.
[10]
M. K. V. Carr, “The water relations and irrigation requirements of coffee.” Experimental Agriculture vol. 37, pp. 1-36, 2001.
[11]
Taye Kufa, “Ecophysiological diversity of wild Arabica populations in Ethiopia: Growth, water relations and hydraulic characteristics along a climatic gradient.” Ph.D. thesis, Ecology and Development Series, NO 46, Cuvillier Verlag, Gottingen, 305 pp, 2006.
[12]
Taye K., Mesfin Abebe, Paulos Dubale, “Dry matter production and distribution in Arabica coffee seedlings as affected by media components.” In: Asfaw Z, Getachew B, Belay S, Bulcha W, Nigussie A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth Crop Science Society of Ethiopia (CSSE), SEBIL vol. 10, pp. 154-164, 2004.
[13]
Yacob Edjamo, Taye Kufa, Alemseged Yilma, “Varietal and age impacts on Arabica coffee leaf growth parameters at three locations.” In: Kidane Georgis and Yohannes Degago (eds.). Crop Management Options to Sustain Food Security: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of Agronomy and Crop Physiology Society of Ethiopia (ACPSE), 29-30, May 1997, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 38-51, 1998.
[14]
L. Poorter, “Growth responses of 15 rainforest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits.” Func. Ecol. Vol. 13, pp. 396-410, 1999.
[15]
H. L. Christopher, “Leaf area accumulation helps juvenile evergreen trees tolerate shade in a temperate rainforest.” Oecologia vol. 132, pp. 188-196, 2002.
[16]
C. J. F Ter Braak, P. Smilauer, “Canoco for windows version 4.52. Biometrics-quantitative methods in the field and earth sciences”. Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Center, The Netherlands, 2003.
[17]
C. J. F. Ter Braak, P. Smilauer, “Canoco for windows version 4.52. Biometrics-quantitative methods in the field and earth sciences
[18]
Taye Kufa, “Biomass production and distribution in seedlings of Coffea arabica genotypes under contrasting nursery environments in southwestern Ethiopia.” Agricultural Sciences vol. 6, pp. 835-843, 2012.
[19]
D. Kumar, L. L. Tieszen, “Photosynthesis in Coffea arabicaI. Effects of light and temperature.” Expl. Agric.vol. 16, pp. 13-19, 1980.
[20]
N. R Chiariello, C.B. Field, H.A. Mooney, “Midday wilting in a tropical pioneer tree.” Func Ecol. vol. 1, pp. 3-11, 1987.
[21]
L. Poorter, S. F. Oberbauer, “Photosynthetic induction responses of two rainforest tree species in relation to light environment.” Oecologia vol. 96, pp. 193-199, 1993.
[22]
C. H. Körner, “Some often overlooked plant characteristics as determinants of plant growth: a reconsideration.” Func Ecol. vol. 5, pp. 162-173, 1994.
[23]
E. M. Veenendaal, M. D. Swaine, V. K. Agyeman, D. Blay, I. K. Abebrese, C. E. Mullins, “Differences in plant and soil water relations in and around a forest gap in West Africa during the dry season may influence seedling establishment and survival. ” Journal of Ecology vol. 84, pp. 83-90, 1996.
[24]
K. Kitajima, “Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees.” Oecologia vol. 98, pp. 419-428, 1994.
[25]
O. O. Osunkoya, J. Ash, M. S. Hopkins, A. W. Graham, “Influence of seed size and seedling ecological attributes on shade tolerance of rain forest tree species in Northern Queensland. ” Journal of Ecology vol. 82, pp. 149-63, 1994.
[26]
T. J. Givnish, “Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective.” Aust J Plant Physiol. Vol. 15, pp. 63-92, 1988.
[27]
D. A. King, “Influence of light level on the growth and morphology of saplings in a Panamanian forest.” American Journal of Botany vol. 81, pp. 948-957, 1994.
[28]
F. C. Meinzer, J. L. Ingamells, C. Crisosto, “ Carbon isotope discrimination correlates with bean yield of diverse coffee seedlings populations ” Hort. Science vol. 26, pp. 1413-1414, 1991.
[29]
W. Larcher, Physiological Plant Ecology: Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups (4th ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2003.
[30]
H. Poorter, E. Garnier, “Plant growth analysis: an evaluation of experimental design and computational methods.” Journal of Experimental Botany vol. 47, pp. 1342-53, 1996.
[31]
T. Kohyama, “A functional model describing sapling growth under a tropical forest canopy”. Func Ecol. vol.5, pp. 83-90, 1991.
[32]
M. P. H. Gathaara, F. M. Muthur, R. C. Cheruiyot, “Biomass accumulation in the various plant organs of coffee Arabica L., cultivar Ruiru 11, under drip irrigation in Kenya,” ASIC 17th Colloquium, Nairobi, pp. 752-759, 1997.
[33]
R. L. Chazdon, “Sun flecks in the forest understory.” Advances in Ecological Research 18: 1- 63, 1988.
[34]
M. B. Walters, P. B. Reich, “Trade-offs in low light CO2 exchange: a component of variation in shade tolerance among cold temperate tree seedlings.” Func Ecol. vol. 14, pp. 155-165, 2000.
[35]
R. H. Waring, W. G. Thies, D. Muscato, “ Stem growth per unit leaf area: a measure of tree vigor. ” For. Sci. Vol. 26, pp. 112-117, 1980.
[36]
P. Becker, F. C. Meinzer, S. D. Wullschleger, “Hydraulic limitation of tree height: a critique”. Functional Ecology vol. 14, pp. 4-11, 2000.
[37]
N. G. McDowell, N. Phililips, C. Lunch, B. J. Bond, M. G. Ryan, “An investigation of hydraulic limitation and compensation in large, old Douglas-fir trees.” Tree Physiology vol. 22, pp. 763-774, 2002.
[38]
U. G. Hacke, J. S. Sperry, J. Pittermann, “Drought experience and cavitation resistance in six shrubs from the Great Basin, Utah.” Basic and Applied Ecology vol. 1, pp.31-41, 2000.
[39]
H. Maherali, E. H. DeLucia, “Influence of climate-driven shifts in biomass allocation on water transport and storage in ponderosa pine.” Oecologia vol. 4, pp. 481-491, 2001.
[40]
J. S. Sperr, F. R. Adler, G. S. Campbell, J. P. Comstock, “Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model.” Plant, Cell and Environment vol. 25, pp. 347-359, 1998.
[41]
U. Niinemets, “The controversy over traits conferring shade-tolerance in trees: ontogenetic changes revisited.” Journal of Ecology vol. 2, pp. 464-470, 2006.
[42]
L. Poorter, “Light-dependent changes in biomass allocation and their importance for growth of rain forest tree species.” Func Ecol. vol. 1, pp. 113-123, 2001.
[43]
I. Sack, M. T. Tyree, N. M. Holbrook, “Leaf hydraulic architecture correlates with regeneration irradiance in tropical rainforest trees.” New Physiologist vol. 2, pp. 403-413, 2005.
Browse journals by subject